Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130410
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '21 at 04:01
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$62 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 90.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 205 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 416 56% 417 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84AC) 2GB CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.2 Reflection 18.6 Parallax 21.1 17% 20.3 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 22.8 Splatting 17 17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 527ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 106 106 107 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 330 Write 113 Mixed 176 SusWrite 108 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 91.9 4K Mixed 33 126% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 136 104% 141 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 73%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$58 5,099 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: SN03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 179 177 180 178 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 172 Mixed 99.3 SusWrite 176 115% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 235% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GB 1,349 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 19.8 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 19.5 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 15: 1R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
15%	10%	93	285	192	60	7.2"	1360 768	SAM0505 SAMSUNG

History:

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	195x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	128x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	76x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	43x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	23x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16