| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Boot Drive | 63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus Maximus II Formula (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090727 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 17 '21 at 21:21 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
51.3%
Above average
|
45% 69.5 Pts
|
23% 172 Pts
|
11% 175 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Gigabyte(1458 353C) 2GB
CLim: 1357 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
34% 45.5 fps
|
38% 43.3 fps
| ||
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 206 210 209 210 208 MB/s
|
63.8%
Good
|
48% 214 MB/s
|
110% 37.2 MB/s
|
142% 189 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
|
20.8%
Poor
|
19% 6.73 GB/s
|
15% 5.17 GB/s
|
42% 94.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3% | 1% | 116 | 320 | 245 | 60 | 22" | 1680 1050 | SAM03E5 SyncMaster |
History:
Typical Maximus II Formula Builds (Compare 53 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Maximus II Formula
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 14x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 10x |
| Core2 Extreme X9650Intel $850Bench 53%, 3,122 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples | 3x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 3x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 26% - Poor | Total price: $624 |