| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus Maximus II Formula (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090727 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 17 '21 at 21:00 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 30% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
46.9%
Average
|
43% 67.2 Pts
|
21% 161 Pts
|
10% 164 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Gigabyte(1458 353C) 2GB
CLim: 1084 MHz, MLim: 1597 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.4%
Poor
|
27% 36.9 fps
|
32% 39.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 228 202 229 222 224 MB/s
|
69.3%
Good
|
51% 227 MB/s
|
120% 40.9 MB/s
|
145% 194 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
|
21.2%
Poor
|
19% 6.8 GB/s
|
18% 6.33 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 13: 0R 3G 4B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13% | 7% | 101 | 267 | 145 | 60 | 22" | 1680 1050 | SAM03E5 SyncMaster |
History:
Typical Maximus II Formula Builds (Compare 53 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Maximus II Formula
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 14x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 10x |
| Core2 Extreme X9650Intel $850Bench 53%, 3,122 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples | 3x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 3x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 26% - Poor | Total price: $624 |