Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 15:02
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 70
2-Core 129
60% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 359
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
MSI(1462 277D) 3GB
CLim: 946 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 53.4
33% 42.9 fps
MRender 30.6
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 23.9
26% 32.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 403 406 406 365 369 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 424
Mixed 425
SusWrite 386
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 47.3
154% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 224
172% 234 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 119%
OCZ ARC 100 120GB-$82
109GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 350 348 373 354 372 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 380
Write 364
Mixed 273
SusWrite 361
78% 344 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 32
119% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 236
186% 259 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
882GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 153 152 153 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 157
Write 152
Mixed 122
SusWrite 153
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.5% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 37" 1280 720 PHLC028 Philips 220TW
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback