PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120907 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 17 '21 at 14:30 |
Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 42% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
56.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$31
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 59 55 59 58 42 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 23 24 24 23 29 MB/s
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 320GB
173GB free
Firmware: V54OA7EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 31 30 29 28 30 MB/s
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 6 | 60 | 22" | 1280 720 | FUS0762 Q22W-1 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 12x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 9x |
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples | 4x |
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 3x |
HD 7950AMD $290Bench 29%, 33,820 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $275 |