HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 836B
Memory	6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190508
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '21 at 13:07
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	JOR-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	29% Poor	Memory 43.6 1-Core 23.3 2-Core 46.8 25% 37.9 Pts	4-Core 78.9 8-Core 111 12% 95.1 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% HP(103C 836B) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6677 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	6.79% Terrible	Lighting 7.8 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 9.4 6% 9.13 fps	MRender 14.5 Gravity 8.7 Splatting 6.3 8% 9.83 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 6.79% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 167 167 171 161 158 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 1,115 Write 686 Mixed 468 SusWrite 179 135% 612 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 25.2 83% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 186 137% 182 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 317%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 506GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 81 81 74 84 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 104 Write 73.2 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 83.8 51% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 75% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB 4,998 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 14.4 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	2	71	3	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD058C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx Builds (Compare 2,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,682x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	772x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,408x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	983x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	48x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	212x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	104x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	91x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	241x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	212x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	148x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $33

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16