Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1497
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '21 at 12:07
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	66%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 77 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 156 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 315 36% 282 Pts	64-Core 332 21% 332 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1497) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2476 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.75% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1 1% 1 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.75% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 69 65 47 60 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 18.3 Write 53.3 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 56.9 27% 37.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.2 63% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 433GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 174 160 167 152 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 130 Write 120 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 167 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 1,516 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 54GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 20 22 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 19.8 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 22.1 29% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 83% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 1x4GB 1,487 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.5% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8 24% 8.53 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.8 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 86.2 46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	988x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	108x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	97x

RAM
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	19x
8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 2x2GBMicronBench 46%, 1,198 samples	18x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16