Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory17.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 10:13
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 127
2-Core 236
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 673
67% 544 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Gainward(10B0 1180) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.1% Below average
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 48.8
30% 40.7 fps
MRender 48.9
Gravity 45.8
Splatting 36.9
35% 43.9 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,046
Write 1,499
Mixed 1,428
368% 1,658 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 73.7
245% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,073
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 945
693% 914 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
140GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 291 161 160 162 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 445
Mixed 358
SusWrite 213
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 50.1
181% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 240
177% 231 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 122%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB
184GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 137 134 140 126 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 137
Write 139
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 134
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
286% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.2% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 19.8
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 17% 12 107 6 60 27" 1920 1080 DEL40F7 DELL P2717H
History:
Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback