PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus STRIKER II EXTREME (all builds) |
Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100128 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 17 '21 at 00:06 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
|
64.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Gigabyte(1458 3628) 3GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
217GB free
Firmware: 4150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 185 197 176 171 169 MB/s
|
59%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 184 167 175 172 169 MB/s
|
54.3%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
198GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 844 866 857 857 843 MB/s
|
221%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
63% | 14% | 145 | 300 | 234 | 30 | 84.6" | 1638 864 | SAM0F17 SAMSUNG |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 10x |
Core2 Extreme X9770IntelBench 57%, 522 samples | 5x |
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 580Nvidia $450Bench 23%, 15,395 samples | 5x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 24% - Poor | Total price: $691 |