Acer Aspire F5-573G

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire F5-573G (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Captain_SK
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170526
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '21 at 20:59
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 66.4 1-Core 98.3 2-Core 174 64% 113 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 259 35% 260 Pts	64-Core 258 16% 258 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M 38,813 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Acer(1025 108F) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6647 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Lighting 17.1 Reflection 19.5 Parallax 15.9 14% 17.5 fps	MRender 19.4 Gravity 17.3 Splatting 12.7 13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 191 167 154 155 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	78% Very good	Read 426 Write 228 Mixed 198 SusWrite 175 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 85.9 4K Mixed 23.9 124% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 68.8 116% 229 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 83%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 55GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 77 95 66 63 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 481 Write 395 Mixed 395 SusWrite 116 77% 347 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 0.5 61% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 2x16GB 1,968 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.9% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 23.5 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 21 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	10	57	6	60	23.8"	2048 1152	ACR068F Acer VG240YU

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire F5-573G Builds (Compare 1,599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-573G

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	727x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	492x
Core i7-6500UIntelBench 46%, 102,213 samples	153x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	892x
GeForce 940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 7,286 samples	295x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	212x

SSD
RBUSNS8280S3128GH2 128GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,212 samples	64x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	62x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	36x

RAM
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 13,568 samples	220x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	80x
ACR21D4S15HAG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 2,395 samples	71x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16