Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 20:41
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-11700K-$394
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 186
2-Core 376
118% 218 Pts
4-Core 725
8-Core 1,305
127% 1,015 Pts
64-Core 1,717
115% 1,717 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 113%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PowerColor(148C 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.1% Average
Lighting 51
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 65.1
41% 49.1 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 53.9
Splatting 27.1
41% 38.5 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 42%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 838 422 424 424 424 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,532
Write 1,414
Mixed 1,128
SusWrite 493
255% 1,142 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 80.8
302% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1263
DQ Write 1,300
DQ Mixed 971
816% 1,178 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 241%
Great: 238%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$200
25GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 165 158 164 155 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 340
Write 219
Mixed 228
SusWrite 152
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 45.3
182% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 225
175% 243 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 87%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$70
17GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 58 57 57 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 67.1
Write 61.9
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 56.5
45% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 78%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
1GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 74.2
Write 76.3
Mixed 55.6
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 22
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 28.6
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 27: 3R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 13% 67 276 192 60 24" 1920 1080 BNQ7840 BenQ G2420HD
History:
Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $590
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback