Acer Aspire 5739G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 5739G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JM50-MV
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 19:56
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core2 Duo P7550
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 62
1-Core 40.2
2-Core 79.6
40% 60.6 Pts
4-Core 81.2
8-Core 78.3
11% 79.8 Pts
64-Core 81.3
6% 81.3 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 130M
Acer(1025 021E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 1.1
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$35
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 217 217 221 198 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.5% Average
Read 247
Write 224
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 186
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 11.9
55% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 1.1
37% 88.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire 5739G Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5739G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $211Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback