Razer Blade Pro 17 (Fall 2019)

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	80% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade Pro 17 (Fall 2019) (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA730
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190910
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '21 at 19:51
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 77.5 1-Core 122 2-Core 210 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 535 55% 445 Pts	64-Core 735 46% 735 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q) 7,789 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Device(1A58 3001) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80% Excellent	Lighting 98 Reflection 124 Parallax 121 80% 114 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 95.2 Splatting 81 80% 101 fps
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 102%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-00A00 1TB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 236% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 368 371 356 351 350 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 1,818 Write 1,403 Mixed 1,074 SusWrite 404 261% 1,175 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 35.8 124% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 674 DQ Write 75 DQ Mixed 141 162% 296 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 289%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 21.9 74% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 19.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 24: 2R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
24%	38%	21	140	57	120	17.2"	1536 864	AUOA988

History:

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Pro 17 (Fall 2019) Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (Fall 2019)

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	162x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 90%, 7,789 samples	79x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	62x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	14x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	46x
CA5-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 181%, 1,283 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	13x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	101x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	11x
SP032GBSFU266F02 2x31.5GBUnknownBench 79%, 21 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16