Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 19:00
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-4160-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 179
76% 124 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 276
38% 276 Pts
64-Core 278
19% 278 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8461) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
3.9% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 8.2
2% 5.6 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.1
6% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Generic S050 Hard drive 500GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA7M0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 129 151 120 122 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 182
Write 146
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 129
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HUA721075KLA330 750GB
698GB free
Firmware: GK8OA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 30 31 30 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 47%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
452GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 148 148 151 151 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 147
Write 140
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 148
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 120GB
1GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 39
Write 18
Mixed 17.5
28% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 9.7
697% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 13.1
DQ Mixed 1.3
547% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 74%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% -nan(ind)% 0 90 67 60 54.6" 1920 1080 SAM0C26 SAMSUNG
Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $212
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback