Asus GL702VM

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus GL702VM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL702VM
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161006
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 154 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 532 54% 435 Pts	64-Core 521 32% 521 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1580) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.1% Average	Lighting 59.1 Reflection 99.2 Parallax 59.4 48% 72.6 fps	MRender 65.2 Gravity 59.8 Splatting 61.5 51% 62.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30100P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 216 230 216 214 218 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 405 Write 234 Mixed 199 SusWrite 222 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 22.5 110% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 176 165% 259 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 474GB free Firmware: JB0OA3V0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 116 117 116 115 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 99.3 Write 86.6 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 116 58% 80.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB 8,819 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 13 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 61: 6R 6G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
61%	48%	52	230	144	120	23.8"	1920 1080	HPN36DA HP X24ih

History:

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GL702VM Builds (Compare 441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

System: Asus GL702VM

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	411x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	438x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	91x
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 2,542 samples	43x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	18x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples	144x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	32x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 38%, 4,427 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16