Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '21 at 18:40
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Memory 84.8 1-Core 118 2-Core 259 84% 154 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 716 75% 601 Pts	64-Core 731 45% 731 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 04C2) CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.2% Average	Lighting 58.3 Reflection 58.6 Parallax 79.8 48% 65.6 fps	MRender 58.5 Gravity 62 Splatting 43.6 44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 41 5.3 57 50 7.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 428 Write 264 Mixed 313 SusWrite 38.7 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 1 90% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 17.9 DQ Mixed 18.2 37% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 100%
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 76GB free Firmware: SBFK62B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 244 171 263 173 227 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 288 Write 103 Mixed 358 SusWrite 249 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 77.2 4K Mixed 37.5 145% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 219 192% 284 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB 32,519 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	44.3% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 12.4 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11.9 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 13: 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
13%	6%	77	323	256	144	23.5"	1920 1080	MSI1462 Optix G24C

History:

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	444x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	251x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	225x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	145x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	136x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	104x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	69x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	85x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16