| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Toshiba Qosmio X75-A (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1 |
| Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140418 |
| Uptime | 1.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 16 '21 at 18:17 |
| Run Duration | 233 Seconds |
| Run User | BOL-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.8%
Good
|
67% 118 Pts
|
49% 396 Pts
|
30% 477 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770M
Toshiba(1179 FA77) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
16% 20.7 fps
|
18% 21.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 144 139 136 132 128 MB/s
|
66%
Good
|
64% 288 MB/s
|
81% 27.6 MB/s
|
269% 357 MB/s
|
|
|
44% 60 MB/s
|
98% 0.77 MB/s
| ||
|
ZTE MMC Storage 2GB
2GB free, PID 0154
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.4 MB/s
|
2.84%
Terrible
|
8% 5.7 MB/s
|
7% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.5%
Average
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
24% 8.33 GB/s
|
46% 86.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | -nan(ind)% | 0 | 8 | 6 | 60 | 17.2" | 1280 720 | AUO209D |
Typical Qosmio X75-A Builds (Compare 77 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Qosmio X75-A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples | 72x |
| Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples | 3x |
| Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples | 47x |
| GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 38% - Below average | Total price: $376 |