Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade Stealth  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Blade Stealth
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170604
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 15:50
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 43.5
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 30.9
25% 34 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 199
20% 159 Pts
64-Core 196
13% 196 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(1A58 6753) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 3.4
2% 3.13 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4.6
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 569 340 331 332 319 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 812
Write 770
Mixed 545
SusWrite 368
140% 624 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 20.2
68% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 193
136% 174 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung MT52L1G32D4PG-107 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 14% 7 20 11 60 13.3" 1920 1080 SHP1493 LQ133Z1JW26
History:
Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 1,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $185
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback