Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_X512JP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_X512JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JP
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 15:27
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 194
79% 133 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 379
43% 330 Pts
64-Core 379
25% 379 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 1B2F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.67% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 9.8
6% 11.7 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 0.2
7% 5.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.67%
Great: 14%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 283 285 283 276 236 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,133
Write 1,170
Mixed 1,087
SusWrite 293
207% 921 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 62.9
214% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 733
DQ Write 569
DQ Mixed 643
483% 648 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 159%
Great: 189%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 120 120 118 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 133
Write 97.6
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 117
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 7: 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 16% 19 92 33 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE07F1
History:
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_X512JP Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_X512JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $68
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $379Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback