PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Lenovo 20THCTO1WW (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO 20THCTO1WW |
Memory | 57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210415 |
Uptime | 2.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 16 '21 at 15:16 |
Run Duration | 229 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
CPU Throttled | 85% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W-10855M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
89.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro T2000 with Max-Q Design
Legend(17AA 22C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.66
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.9%
Below average
|
|||
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Legend(17AA 22C0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
|
4.75%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMAA4GS7AJR8N-WM 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
|
92.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7% | 60% | 5 | 227 | 144 | 100 | 48.9" | 3840 1080 | SAM0F20 C49J89x |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples | 15x |
Core i9-10885HIntelBench 81%, 6,135 samples | 12x |
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples | 20x |
Quadro T2000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 39%, 1,016 samples | 15x |
Quadro T1000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 36%, 566 samples | 14x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |