Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 221%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics228% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 12:26
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$270
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 307
103% 185 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 908
94% 739 Pts
64-Core 1,125
76% 1,125 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$1,200
Zotac(19DA 2612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
228% Outstanding
Lighting 297
Reflection 279
Parallax 335
240% 304 fps
MRender 342
Gravity 252
Splatting 183
214% 259 fps
Poor: 191%
This bench: 228%
Great: 255%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$34
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 33 131 15 28 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.1% Poor
Read 167
Write 95
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 61.7
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 11
46% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 95%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
23GB free
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 259 246 93 28 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 378
Write 302
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 159
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 13.4
51% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 32.4
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 17.2
14% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 55%
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
158GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 211 210 210 211 214 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 498
Write 287
Mixed 242
SusWrite 221
69% 312 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 28.3
143% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 200
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
160GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 184 184 184 183 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 126
Mixed 111
SusWrite 183
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMK8GX4M2C3000C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK8GX4M2C3000C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 24GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 40.5
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 40.7
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 23,376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,117
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $360Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback