| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H170M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151110 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 16 '21 at 11:45 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | LTU-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84%
Excellent
|
85% 148 Pts
|
64% 518 Pts
|
38% 620 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.3%
Below average
|
38% 53.7 fps
|
42% 52.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 503 441 475 474 497 479 MB/s
|
182%
Outstanding
|
204% 924 MB/s
|
198% 71.5 MB/s
|
359% 559 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 186 190 190 190 188 MB/s
|
113%
Outstanding
|
118% 161 MB/s
|
145% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68%
Good
|
68% 23.8 GB/s
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
64% 62.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H170M Pro4 Builds (Compare 315 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H170M Pro4 - $118
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 68x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 55x |
| Core i5-6600Intel $132Bench 68%, 80,688 samples | 40x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 30x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 29x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 25x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $326 |