HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8744
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 03:20
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 226
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 764
73% 605 Pts
64-Core 946
58% 946 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 89%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1006 1TB
484GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1875 1680 1468 1609 1525 1559 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,252
Write 2,123
Mixed 1,249
SusWrite 1,619
354% 1,561 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 59
197% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 696
DQ Mixed 823
607% 801 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 245%
Great: 317%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.6% Above average
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 21.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd1xxx Builds (Compare 761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback