| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20120507 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 15 '21 at 19:30 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.8%
Very good
|
66% 112 Pts
|
41% 309 Pts
|
20% 327 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.9%
Poor
|
31% 39.5 fps
|
28% 35.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 120 123 123 123 MB/s
|
70.7%
Very good
|
75% 103 MB/s
|
145% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
66GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 165 170 177 177 177 MB/s
|
89.4%
Excellent
|
88% 122 MB/s
|
155% 1.2 MB/s
| |
|
USB Flash DISK 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 18 18 17 MB/s
|
6.74%
Terrible
|
12% 9.52 MB/s
|
12% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
52.8%
Above average
|
52% 18.1 GB/s
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
60% 66.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,672 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 191x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 177x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 167x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 235x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 109x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 105x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $525 |