Lenovo 90H00000US

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 90H00000US (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 36C5
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170117
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '21 at 19:04
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 131 2-Core 247 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 688 68% 556 Pts	64-Core 706 44% 706 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 460 181 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Device(1642 1641) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 28.3 Parallax 31.4 16% 26.6 fps	MRender 27.8 Gravity 24.4 Splatting 25.3 21% 25.8 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L1 128GB 2,374 User benchmarks, average bench 169% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5L1QCXB7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,574 Write 751 Mixed 515 207% 947 MB/s	4K Read 59.1 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 74.7 259% 91.2 MB/s	DQ Read 886 DQ Write 739 DQ Mixed 710 560% 778 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 213%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 195GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 480 482 487 486 487 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 463 Mixed 364 SusWrite 479 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 59.3 196% 67.9 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 352 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 134%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 3TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 228 227 225 228 224 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 223 Write 223 Mixed 95.4 SusWrite 226 140% 192 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 1.7 318% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 136%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$65 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 403GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 101 102 101 102 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 104 Write 101 Mixed 70.6 SusWrite 100 69% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.M16FD 2x16GB 421 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	81.8% Excellent	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 25.5 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 33.9 SC Mixed 26.1 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90H00000US Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90H00000US

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon RX 460AMDBench 21%, 181 samples	3x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 169%, 2,374 samples	1x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $46Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	2x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 16GBHynixBench 64%, 51 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $167

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16