Lenovo 20BHA0A700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20BHA0A700  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BHA0A700
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '21 at 18:43
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 203
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 532
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1100M
Legend(17AA 221E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.5 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 8
Splatting 7.1
6% 7.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microdream 256G SSD 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQP1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 296 121 121 207 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 195
Write 79.6
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 213
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 9.3
42% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 16.6
13% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback