Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	69.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200514
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '21 at 17:54
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 48 1-Core 135 2-Core 264 76% 149 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 612 69% 540 Pts	64-Core 707 44% 707 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Gigabyte(1458 4088) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.3% Good	Lighting 54.2 Reflection 58.4 Parallax 64.7 44% 59.1 fps	MRender 61.6 Gravity 202 Splatting 157 118% 140 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 353GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 836 764 861 113 142 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 888 Write 863 Mixed 770 SusWrite 471 168% 748 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 26.1 90% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 737 DQ Write 716 DQ Mixed 314 349% 589 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 295%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 114GB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 148 147 151 150 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 141 Write 131 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 149 79% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 162% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	53.9% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 23.1 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 12.4 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC Builds (Compare 3,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	936x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	636x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	400x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	375x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	275x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	257x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	200x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	149x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	149x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	111x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	83x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	65x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $699

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16