Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IH_FA506IH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IH_FA506IH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IH
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '21 at 16:24
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 69.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 261
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 843
85% 689 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 18BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1920 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.8% Average
Lighting 54.7
Reflection 54.3
Parallax 51.6
45% 53.5 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 44.2
42% 53.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 43%
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 18BF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 54
Parallax 20.6
12% 29.9 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 17.1
13% 15.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 726 412 412 409 404 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,525
Write 2,342
Mixed 1,646
SusWrite 460
389% 1,743 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 87.2
290% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,144
DQ Write 769
DQ Mixed 976
723% 963 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 262%
Great: 340%
Ct1000bx 50 1TB
77GB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 208 16 16 19 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 493
Write 424
Mixed 396
SusWrite 123
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 26.4
142% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 36.4
85% 176 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 91%
SSK 1TB
495GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 337 332 332 331 332 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 321
Write 331
Mixed 319
SusWrite 335
74% 326 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 38.3
128% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 217
161% 211 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 93%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
24GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 63 61 62 63 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 113%
mSD Card 4GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.9 7.9 8 7.9 7.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 42.8
Write 8
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 7.9
19% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
82% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6J1 CT16G4SFD8266.C16FD1 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 27.5
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 19.7
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IH_FA506IH Builds (Compare 232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IH_FA506IH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback