| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 70.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180920 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 15 '21 at 15:56 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | ZAF-User |
| Background CPU | 85% |
PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.4%
Above average
|
68% 123 Pts
|
42% 318 Pts
|
23% 376 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
PNY(196E 1312) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.4%
Very good
|
73% 87.3 fps
|
66% 81.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 200 144 138 138 148 MB/s
|
54.5%
Above average
|
57% 255 MB/s
|
66% 22.1 MB/s
|
129% 210 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
372GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 129 133 132 125 123 MB/s
|
72%
Very good
|
69% 95.2 MB/s
|
118% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Goodram GR26C16S8K2HU416 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
57.6%
Above average
|
64% 22.3 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
34% 117 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,356 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,184x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 683x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 212x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 303x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 207x |
| GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples | 205x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $359 |