Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3167-A1
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141201
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '21 at 14:29
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2 3,610 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 105 2-Core 187 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 482 50% 402 Pts	64-Core 476 30% 476 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.16 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	22.4% Poor	Lighting 27.4 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 28 22% 28.7 fps	MRender 25.2 Gravity 28.3 Splatting 28.8 23% 27.4 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0509 SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 254 274 208 71 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 426 Write 264 Mixed 261 SusWrite 189 64% 285 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 18.8 86% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 33.1 48% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 69%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 64GB free Firmware: 01.01S03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 69 71 71 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 96.8 Write 97.7 Mixed 86.1 SusWrite 70.3 65% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GLK72V6H 4x8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 16.8 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.9 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W520 POWER Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER

CPU
Xeon E3-1230 V2Intel $266Bench 70%, 8,235 samples	47x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	14x
Xeon E3-1275 V2Intel $400Bench 74%, 461 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	17x
T600NvidiaBench 29%, 1,270 samples	8x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	7x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 56%, 161 samples	7x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 24GBHynixBench 54%, 16 samples	6x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 52%, 199 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $706

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16