Asus GL503VMF

Performance Results

Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop 75%
Workstation 28%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAsus GL503VMF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL503VMF
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '21 at 10:49
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 151
70% 113 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 461
49% 382 Pts
64-Core 472
32% 472 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 155E) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45% Average
Lighting 53.7
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 58.6
43% 59.9 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 58.3
47% 60 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45%
Great: 52%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1002 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 97 100 101 88 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 366
Write 111
Mixed 151
SusWrite 101
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 20.5
87% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 224
181% 260 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GL503VMF Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop 75%
Workstation 28%

System: Asus GL503VMF

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback