Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3167-A1
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141201
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '21 at 09:40
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2 3,610 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 210 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 510 58% 451 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.16 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	22.5% Poor	Lighting 27.4 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 27.9 22% 28.6 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 28.7 Splatting 28.9 23% 27.6 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0509 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 153 153 154 136 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 388 Write 258 Mixed 263 SusWrite 149 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 15.3 68% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 33.2 48% 88.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 69%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 64GB free Firmware: 01.01S03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 78 78 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 101 Write 92 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 77.2 66% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC72C8PG0NF-DI 4x4GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	56.1% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 16.9 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W520 POWER Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER

CPU
Xeon E3-1230 V2Intel $266Bench 70%, 8,235 samples	47x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	14x
Xeon E3-1275 V2Intel $400Bench 74%, 461 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	17x
T600NvidiaBench 29%, 1,270 samples	8x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	7x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 56%, 161 samples	7x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 24GBHynixBench 54%, 16 samples	6x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 52%, 199 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $706

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16