HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory9.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180719
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '21 at 09:12
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 158
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 523
48% 391 Pts
64-Core 518
35% 518 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000
Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 30
20% 27.5 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 27.2
Splatting 28.5
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 23%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$374
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 255 251 263 238 254 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,419
Write 676
Mixed 670
SusWrite 262
167% 757 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 55.3
195% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 861
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 444
357% 520 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 158%
Great: 260%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 121 129 128 127 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 104
Write 85.9
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 124
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.7
191% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
68.6% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 23
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 1,697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $350
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback