Asus ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive20.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '21 at 09:11
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-10850K-$400
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 158
2-Core 301
104% 184 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 1,084
98% 801 Pts
64-Core 1,980
133% 1,980 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$400
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.3% Very good
Lighting 94.4
Reflection 108
Parallax 102
76% 101 fps
MRender 95.3
Gravity 101
Splatting 96.6
81% 97.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 88%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 256GB-$150
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 7.2 7.4 9.8 8.8 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 385
Write 17.2
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 8.8
24% 115 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 3.8
15% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 54%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$265
128GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 477 255 61 161 220 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 409
Write 450
Mixed 383
SusWrite 273
85% 379 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 327
248% 334 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 95.5
135% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 99%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$120
931GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1835 1737 1727 1726 1727 1732 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
312% Outstanding
Read 2,021
Write 2172
Mixed 1,756
SusWrite 1,747
434% 1,924 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 68.5
238% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 1,018
DQ Mixed 1,134
851% 1,140 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 312%
Great: 340%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$78
165GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 780 503 470 457 451 451 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,257
Write 952
Mixed 538
SusWrite 518
182% 816 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 54.3
191% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,041
DQ Write 1,015
DQ Mixed 824
675% 960 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 187%
Great: 257%
WD Game Drive 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 108 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 108
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 108
132% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.7
262% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 67%
MKI SAMBO 16GB
11GB free, PID 1167
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 15
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 14.8
24% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
36% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 27.7
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 28.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING - $393

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,893
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $182
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback