Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 15 '21 at 08:35
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$143
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 336
41% 306 Pts
64-Core 386
26% 386 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 47.8
Parallax 38.1
32% 41.6 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 27.2
32% 34.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$65
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 321 314 305 297 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 762
Write 669
Mixed 655
SusWrite 324
135% 602 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 64.1
206% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 728
DQ Mixed 1,061
719% 875 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 149%
Great: 288%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$53
388GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 120 124 120 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 166
Write 168
Mixed 20
SusWrite 120
85% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 18.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 4,482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $435
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback