Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '21 at 08:35
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	57%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 105 2-Core 212 73% 131 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 317 41% 309 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.4% Below average	Lighting 39 Reflection 47.8 Parallax 38.1 32% 41.6 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 40.1 Splatting 27.2 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 321 314 305 297 288 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 762 Write 669 Mixed 655 SusWrite 324 135% 602 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 64.1 206% 70.5 MB/s	DQ Read 836 DQ Write 728 DQ Mixed 1,061 719% 875 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 302%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 388GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 120 124 120 121 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 166 Write 168 Mixed 20 SusWrite 120 85% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 2x8GB 7,618 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	69.2% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 22.2 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 18.9 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 89.8 44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,177x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	681x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	211x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	302x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	207x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $295Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	205x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	247x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	152x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	87x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	115x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	56x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16