Asus H110M-E/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	95.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160511
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '21 at 01:00
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 109 2-Core 174 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 524 53% 432 Pts	64-Core 555 34% 555 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3730) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.5% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 141 Parallax 124 96% 128 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 122 Splatting 111 94% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ZTSSD-S10-240G-TB 240GB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 92 72 64 37 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 432 Write 407 Mixed 298 SusWrite 104 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 80.2 4K Mixed 31.8 120% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 158 157% 250 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 89%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 398GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 137 136 139 137 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Read 169 Write 169 Mixed 33.3 SusWrite 136 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x16GB 565 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.7% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 20.2 63% 22.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 17.5 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	211x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	186x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	167x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	176x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	167x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	108x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	88x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	27x

RAM
CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x16GBGEILBench 73%, 565 samples	56x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	33x
9905678-023.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 4,415 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16