PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 19.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55D-E (all builds) |
Memory | 9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20091123 |
Uptime | 4.9 Days |
Run Date | Jun 14 '21 at 22:20 |
Run Duration | 252 Seconds |
Run User | NZL-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.5%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 7.5 14 37 35 38 MB/s
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
|||
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
226GB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 140 147 137 134 138 MB/s
|
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
92GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 83 86 81 80 82 MB/s
|
35%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
432GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 19 29 39 38 41 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$242
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 114 114 112 115 MB/s
|
||||
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
25GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 96 92 92 98 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
20GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 67 66 66 65 MB/s
|
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 1TB
432GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
13.7%
Very poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
41.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 257x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 155x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 142x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 70x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 45x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 43x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $159 |