Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II (all builds)
Memory	22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210311
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '21 at 21:55
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 65 1-Core 142 2-Core 291 87% 166 Pts	4-Core 567 8-Core 820 87% 693 Pts	64-Core 1,056 65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% MSI(1462 2015) CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Lighting 29.3 Reflection 32.8 Parallax 37.1 24% 33.1 fps	MRender 31.3 Gravity 26.3 Splatting 25.6 22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$42 17,946 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 338GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900KA3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 451 448 460 462 461 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 369 Write 420 Mixed 345 SusWrite 453 90% 397 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 95.4 4K Mixed 38.9 149% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 169 161% 247 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 102%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 83GB free Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 77 80 77 77 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 324 Write 381 Mixed 288 SusWrite 123 63% 279 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 21.9 130% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 31.7 74% 152 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 78%
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 123GB free Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 162 78 78 78 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 303 Write 122 Mixed 239 SusWrite 126 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 32.5 128% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 162 144% 215 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 95%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 103 107 107 105 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 105 Write 105 Mixed 77.7 SusWrite 106 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 84%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB 2,378 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 144GB free Firmware: MJAOA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 85 85 85 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	60% Above average	Read 124 Write 132 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 84.5 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 252GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 100 102 103 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 109 Write 103 Mixed 77.1 SusWrite 101 72% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3600 C18 Series 2x16GB 2,007 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.7% Good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 25.4 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 24.9 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	262x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $119Bench 86%, 14,368 samples	202x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	180x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	148x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	127x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	52x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	44x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	39x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	64x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	56x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)