Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '21 at 19:05
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 83.8 1-Core 115 2-Core 226 80% 142 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 707 69% 566 Pts	64-Core 965 60% 965 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	3.12% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 9.7 Parallax 7.9 5% 7.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.12% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB 4,749 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 66 65 73 68 71 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	70% Very good	Read 470 Write 317 Mixed 229 SusWrite 81.3 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 34.6 125% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 79 DQ Mixed 120 102% 156 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 83%
Teclast CoolFlash 16GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID ef18 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	7.98% Terrible	Read 23.7 Write 13.6 Mixed 8.9 SusWrite 15 19% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.98% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x16GB 9,797 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 23.1 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 23.5 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	126x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	79x
Core i5-9400FIntel $101Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	51x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	28x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	17x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	15x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16