Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA

Performance Results

Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JA
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 17:52
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 55%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 73.7
36% 54.4 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 202
21% 166 Pts
64-Core 248
17% 248 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.6
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 0.3
3% 2.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 241 213 215 219 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 1106
Write 792
Mixed 889
SusWrite 228
168% 754 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 35.8
110% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 572
DQ Write 389
DQ Mixed 400
320% 454 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 114%
Great: 188%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
815GB free
Firmware: JU0C2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 121 74 63 108 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 132
Write 140
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 101
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA Builds (Compare 374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 64%
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback