Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200826
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '21 at 12:28
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140 16,466 User benchmarks, average bench 81% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 72.7 1-Core 141 2-Core 276 87% 163 Pts	4-Core 534 8-Core 643 76% 589 Pts	64-Core 578 36% 578 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 8790) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.4% Below average	Lighting 50.1 Reflection 54.5 Parallax 0.3 41% 35 fps	MRender 40.7 Gravity 48.1 Splatting 19.6 28% 36.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 324GB free Firmware: M6CR041 SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 381 95 156 149 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 495 Write 451 Mixed 408 SusWrite 212 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 0.8 71% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 43.5 DQ Mixed 29.8 41% 78.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 92%
Kingston SA400M8480G 480GB 3,316 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 2.2 2.1 3.1 2.8 3.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 345 Write 419 Mixed 335 SusWrite 36 64% 284 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 92.4 4K Mixed 38 143% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 160 143% 213 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CB8GU2400.C8JT 1x8GB 339 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	42.7% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 15 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 12.4 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	816x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	742x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	772x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	258x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	194x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	144x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $428

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16