Medion ERAZER X7602 D/C482

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Medion ERAZER X7602 D/C482 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION P2A4-EM
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170406
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '21 at 10:57
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 72.6 1-Core 112 2-Core 227 75% 137 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 829 77% 641 Pts	64-Core 1,243 77% 1,243 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50% Above average	Lighting 60.7 Reflection 62.7 Parallax 58.3 50% 60.6 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 64.4 Splatting 58.4 51% 63 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 271GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 422 476 475 457 349 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 462 Mixed 427 SusWrite 428 102% 454 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 53.7 176% 60.1 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 363 274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 129%
120gb SSD 120GB 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 24 107 60 65 66 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 400 Write 255 Mixed 233 SusWrite 75.3 53% 241 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 8.6 76% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 83.1 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 12.7 48% 103 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 823GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 168 164 166 162 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 155 Write 159 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 163 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB 7,811 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	69.2% Good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 21.1 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 31.4 SC Mixed 22 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 95.5 42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X7602 D/C482 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

System: Medion ERAZER X7602 D/C482

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x

SSD
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 2,542 samples	1x

RAM
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples	1x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $179

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16