Medion ERAZER P4607 D/C527

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMedion ERAZER P4607 D/C527  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM2
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 00:32
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$196
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 384
52% 380 Pts
64-Core 390
26% 390 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
Sapphire(174B 2438) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2059 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.5% Average
Lighting 48.9
Reflection 60.9
Parallax 51.9
40% 53.9 fps
MRender 58.4
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 53.7
42% 54.1 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
120gb SSD 120GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 154 48 111 70 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 421
Write 272
Mixed 236
SusWrite 84.3
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 8.3
84% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 83.7
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 14.2
46% 96.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 83%
Intenso Portable SSD 128GB
9GB free
Firmware: 0506
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 38 10 14 11 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.8% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 40.5
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 25.1
8% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 6.1
28% 9.23 MB/s
DQ Read 8.8
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 7.2
6% 9.37 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 64%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
171GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 62 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 61.2
Write 62.8
Mixed 43.4
SusWrite 61.5
78% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 22.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.6
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ERAZER P4607 D/C527 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Medion ERAZER P4607 D/C527

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $486
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback