Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory17.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 23:33
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 134
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 642
67% 536 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.1% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 109
Parallax 98.3
82% 103 fps
MRender 90.3
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 98.7
79% 96.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 325 316 297 306 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,303
Write 792
Mixed 649
SusWrite 325
170% 767 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 49.9
189% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,053
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 471
399% 605 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 160%
Great: 283%
Corsair Performance3 SSD 128GB
13GB free
Firmware: 1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 150 146 132 133 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46% Average
Read 321
Write 147
Mixed 185
SusWrite 136
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 19.1
71% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 87.4
DQ Write 50.2
DQ Mixed 54.5
44% 64 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46%
Great: 54%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
183GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 89 89 123 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 84.5
Write 86.7
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 96.1
65% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52%
Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
93GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 76 82 83 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 76
Write 71.4
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 79.2
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
169GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 77 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 77.3
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
183% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB-$165
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 27
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 22.2
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,095 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $972
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback