Asrock Z77 Professional

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Professional  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 20:12
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 182
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 459
43% 358 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118A) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 129 128 127 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 348
Write 336
Mixed 262
SusWrite 127
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 35.3
116% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 205
152% 201 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 123%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
35GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 123 124 123 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 323
Write 147
Mixed 190
SusWrite 122
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 27.4
96% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 111
97% 146 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
921GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 98 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 101
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 99.1
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 101%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 148 155 152 153 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 137
Write 136
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 152
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
256% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 104%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
1TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 123 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 129
Write 134
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 124
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
246% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73%
Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 160 160 160 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 8
Write 161
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 158
65% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.2
93% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1866C9-8GSR 04CD F3-1866C9-8GXM 04CD F3-1866C9-8GSR 04CD F3-1866C9-8GXM 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Professional Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Professional

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $407
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback