PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z200 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B40h |
Memory | 9.5 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100709 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 13 '21 at 19:10 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
EVGA(3842 3657) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Liteonit LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC8110D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 151 192 193 195 171 MB/s
|
44.2%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
267GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 116 124 122 123 115 MB/s
|
63.2%
Good
|
|||
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 0331
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 15 13 19 9.8 13 MB/s
|
7.07%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 58x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 37x |
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 29x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 19x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 17x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
SSD | |
---|---|
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 11x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 10x |
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $152 |