Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Huananzhi X99-F8 (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory	52.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210120
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '21 at 17:59
Run Duration	313 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 1,417 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 77.4 1-Core 75.2 2-Core 169 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 757 68% 573 Pts	64-Core 1,495 92% 1,495 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 17.8 Reflection 26.4 Parallax 28.6 14% 24.3 fps	MRender 26.5 Gravity 22.8 Splatting 21.1 19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$175 12,594 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 535 617 607 553 672 404 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 544 Write 644 Mixed 601 SusWrite 565 133% 588 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 29.2 96% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 418 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 336 251% 338 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 162%
NE-1TB 1TB 2,390 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 954GB free Firmware: S1111A0L SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 517 520 544 553 552 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 1,201 Write 907 Mixed 741 SusWrite 531 188% 845 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 19.1 110% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 498 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 407 305% 411 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 270%
Corsair Force GS 240GB-$261 4,179 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 680GB free Firmware: 5.20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 261 408 376 330 314 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 454 Write 439 Mixed 373 SusWrite 354 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 40 129% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 351 262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 93%
WDC WD102PURZ-85BXPY0 10TB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 245 248 256 243 241 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 239 Write 232 Mixed 126 SusWrite 246 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 2 11% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 29%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 672GB free Firmware: SC11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 160 162 162 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 151 Write 151 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 161 98% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 98%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 19GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 52 53 52 53 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	47% Average	Read 111 Write 79.2 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 52.4 56% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 59%
Seagate Desktop 8TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 53GB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 81 81 80 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 121 Write 141 Mixed 111 SusWrite 79.9 84% 113 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.8 327% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 93%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 7,128 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 38GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 112 114 115 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 140 Write 124 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 114 127% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 52%
WD Game Drive 8TB 1,072 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 52GB free, PID 2631 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 184 181 142 145 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 213 Write 226 Mixed 144 SusWrite 162 249% 186 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.7 248% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 120%
WD Game Drive 8TB 1,072 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 53GB free, PID 2631 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 183 182 152 133 141 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 212 Write 224 Mixed 141 SusWrite 162 247% 184 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1.6 249% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 120%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Atermiter 2x16GB 839 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.2% Above average	MC Read 23 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 17.5 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 18.9 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-F8 Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 80%

Battleship

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	137x
Xeon E5-2680 v4IntelBench 72%, 1,639 samples	59x
Xeon E5-2680 v3IntelBench 71%, 1,417 samples	32x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	41x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	29x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	23x

SSD
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	26x
512GB 512GBNvmeBench 181%, 2,208 samples	11x
GAMMIX S11 Pro 512GBXPGBench 246%, 21,659 samples	10x

RAM
HNMI8GD4240D0 4x8GBUnknownBench 91%, 126 samples	23x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	23x
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $270

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)