Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 5 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 63.7 1-Core 91.3 2-Core 184 63% 113 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 705 61% 523 Pts	64-Core 659 41% 659 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD MxGPU 57 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Device(0000 0000) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	7.87% Terrible	Lighting 8.7 Reflection 10 Parallax 18.2 7% 12.3 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 13.9 Splatting 12.2 9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.87% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 2TB 2TB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 200 198 196 213 204 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.4% Above average	Read 418 Write 312 Mixed 369 SusWrite 204 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 18.4 62% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 115 85% 113 MB/s

Xensrc PVDISK 86GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 184 188 198 211 205 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x11GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1 of 1 slots used 11GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.5% Good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 22.4 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 12.9 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 138%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples	16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples	14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	6x

SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples	53x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples	5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16