Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2910 108 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Memory 53.7 1-Core 14.9 2-Core 28.6 24% 32.4 Pts	4-Core 41.8 8-Core 47.9 6% 44.8 Pts	64-Core 49.7 3% 49.7 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1854 0200) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4303 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 1 Parallax 1.4 0% 0.87 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB 206 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 430GB free (System drive), PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.8 5.3 6.8 7.1 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	2% Terrible	Read 5.2 Write 3 Mixed 3 SusWrite 5.6 6% 4.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GB 19,285 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron N2910IntelBench 30%, 108 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16