Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 01:09
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$269
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 256
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 783
78% 622 Pts
64-Core 986
66% 986 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$400
CLim: 1020 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.5% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 72.3
58% 58.3 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 57.8
Splatting 28.9
46% 46.9 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 68%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1431
Write 1,968
Mixed 422
284% 1,274 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 24.2
78% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 43.2
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 74.7
67% 97.7 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 305%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$200
95GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 167 170 156 160 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 324
Write 208
Mixed 220
SusWrite 159
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 34.8
131% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 36.7
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 39.4
39% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$110
234GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 86 86 92 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 69.7
Write 60.9
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 90.7
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 62%
Seagate Surveillance 2TB
695GB free
Firmware: CV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 131 129 130 127 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 128
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$73
169GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 59 60 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 74.7
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 58.4
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 32.8
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 30.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 10,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,017
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback